Updated - WINNERS are marked as WINNER in the list of finalists below!
ITA Announcement
The ITA Tunnelling Awards 2019 - The list of finalists disclosed
Since the first edition in 2015 by the International Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, the first fourth editions of the ITA Tunnelling Awards gathered already nearly 1,000 attendees and more than 310 candidacies.
A few months before the event, the judges have examined the submitted candidacies and selected a list of finalists for each of 8 categories.
The 17-strong expert judging panel, chaired by the ITA President Jinxiu (Jenny) Yan, has concluded its deliberation and based on the detailed evaluation, 32 entries have been chosen as finalists and will participate in the second evaluation stage to determine winners.
For the category "Major Project of the Year" (with a budget over 500 M€)
For the category "Project of the Year" (with a budget between 50 and 500 M€)
For the category "Project of the year incl. Renovation" (with a budget up to 50 M€)
For the category "Technical Project Innovation of the year"
For the category "Technical Product/Equipment Innovation of the year"
For the category "Innovative Underground Space Concept of the year"
For the category "Safety Initiative of the Year"
For the category "Young Tunneller of the Year"
For the category "Lifetime Achievment Award"
How transparent is this ITA Award selection? Is it possible to see who voted for which project and justification?
ITA website says The 17-strong expert judging panel, chaired by the ITA President Jinxiu (Jenny) Yan, has concluded its deliberation and based on the detailed evaluation, 32 entries have been chosen as finalists and will participate in the second evaluation stage to determine winners.
Who are these 17 judges? Here they are:
The question is whether they accountable for their choices? I mean, do they produce a report for justifying their choices? Or they just say `because I like it more' or 'because I say so'?
How representative can this panel of judges be? If you look at the judges, they are all current or ex-something. "ITA past-president", "ITA former-president", "Chair of something' "ITA past vice president" .. .. ..
As if a clique running ITA for generations. As if they helped each other to the influential positions in the organization and help each other stay there. As if it is not a democracy but a clique helping themselves to power. As if.
How different could their preferences be in this award candidate selection? Where are the other voices in ITA? Can there be other voices in ITA? Are other voices allowed to exist in ITA?
questions questions questions. What are the answers?
No need to be so harsh on ITA and award candidates.
How do you know that these are the "favoured candidates"? What evidence do you have? Have you seen the full list of candidates before this shortlist? If you haven't seen the full list, how on earth can you claim that it is a crooked shortlist list? You cannot.
My opinion:
Major Project of the Year: I think this is a pretty good list. All interesting projects.
Project of the Year: Again, I do not know the full list, but this short list is interesting.
Project of the Year incl. Renovation: I have no opinion on this category.
Technical Project Innovation of the Year: 4 Innovative projects and 3 of them are from China and 1 from France. Really? Among all the tunneling projects all over the World the most innovative 3 are from China? And what was the last time you've heard France paired with innovation?
Technical Product Innovation of the Year: I have no opinion over this.
Innovative Underground Space Concept of the year: Chinese project looks pretty interesting.
Safety Initation of the Year: Why are there only 3 in shortlist while the other categories have more? Because the innovation area is safety ...
Young Tunneller of the Year: I have no opinion over this.
Here Jury members nationality. Is there correlation with the countries of shortlisted projects?
2 China
2 Australia
2 USA
2 Brazil
2 UK
1 South Korea
1 Russia
1 UAE (an Englishman? LOL)
1 Denmark
1 france
1 India
1 Switzerland
I agree why Gerede tunnel not in list? Jury busy with own country project candidate?
Sustainable Underground Structures category. Some details about the candidates
https://tunnelingonline.com/ita-awards-to-recognize-sustainable-underground-structures/
ITA's “Project of The Year up to €50M including renovation” award category showcases new examples of ongoing rehabilitations of underground infrastructures.
I think it is nowadays
The 5th edition of the ITA Awards will be held from 18 to 20 November 2019 in Miami, Florida
cover tunnel photo by: Matt Brown from London, England / CC BY
Copyright 2019-2024 TunnelContact.com
Where is Gerede Tunel?
https://tunnelcontact.com/discussion/view/1508/turkiye-water-tunnel-project-in-challenging-geology-gerede-in-the-news
Türkiye: Water tunnel project in challenging geology GEREDE in the news : TunnelContact.com
tunnelcontact.comNetworking Site for Tunnel Professionals